Trouble in Goshen

Operating on the conviction, or at least the hope, that it is better to plead forgiveness than ask permission, I acknowledge my debt to Jim Bissett and the Bible. The book’s title was inspired by Jim Bissett’s Agrarian Socialism: Marx, Jefferson, and Jesus in the Oklahoma Countryside. I met Dr....

Full description

Main Author: Fred C. Smith
Format: eBook
Language: Bahasa Inggris
Published: University Press of Mississippi 2014
Subjects:
Online Access: http://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=52768
PINJAM
id oai:lib.umy.ac.id:52768
recordtype oai_dc
spelling oai:lib.umy.ac.id:527682021-06-16T13:06:23ZTrouble in GoshenFred C. SmithRural development—Southern States—History—20th century, Rural poorOperating on the conviction, or at least the hope, that it is better to plead forgiveness than ask permission, I acknowledge my debt to Jim Bissett and the Bible. The book’s title was inspired by Jim Bissett’s Agrarian Socialism: Marx, Jefferson, and Jesus in the Oklahoma Countryside. I met Dr. Bissett once and complimented him on his excellent book and its winsome title. I remember bragging on the title a lot. I think—but cannot be sure—that I threatened to borrow his exquisite and apt phrasing. The title of this book proves my guilt. The second acknowledgment and apology concern the first part of the title. Goshen was the best of the land of Egypt, and the initial terms of the sharecropping arrangement that Joseph negotiated turned out to be liberal and profitable. The prospect of occupying the best of the land on terms that promised prosperity (Pharaoh required only a fifth of the crop—“on fifths,” as a Delta cropper might say) must surely have enticed the sustenance-challenged children of Israel. Any extension of the theological and anthropological implications of the biblical Goshen violates the boundary between employing an analogy and torturing it. Goshen remains a bare analogy, and I claim no thaumaturgic properties in its further application to plain folk of the Great Depression South. The hope, among the most distressed of the Great Depression, of inclusion in one of three “American Goshens” must have engendered feelings at least in some ways akin to those of the Hebrew children as they viewed Goshen for the first time.University Press of Mississippi2014eBookebook 506Bahasa Inggrishttp://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=52768
institution Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
collection Perpustakaan Yogyakarta
language Bahasa Inggris
topic Rural development—Southern States—History—20th century, Rural poor
spellingShingle Rural development—Southern States—History—20th century, Rural poor
Fred C. Smith
Trouble in Goshen
description Operating on the conviction, or at least the hope, that it is better to plead forgiveness than ask permission, I acknowledge my debt to Jim Bissett and the Bible. The book’s title was inspired by Jim Bissett’s Agrarian Socialism: Marx, Jefferson, and Jesus in the Oklahoma Countryside. I met Dr. Bissett once and complimented him on his excellent book and its winsome title. I remember bragging on the title a lot. I think—but cannot be sure—that I threatened to borrow his exquisite and apt phrasing. The title of this book proves my guilt. The second acknowledgment and apology concern the first part of the title. Goshen was the best of the land of Egypt, and the initial terms of the sharecropping arrangement that Joseph negotiated turned out to be liberal and profitable. The prospect of occupying the best of the land on terms that promised prosperity (Pharaoh required only a fifth of the crop—“on fifths,” as a Delta cropper might say) must surely have enticed the sustenance-challenged children of Israel. Any extension of the theological and anthropological implications of the biblical Goshen violates the boundary between employing an analogy and torturing it. Goshen remains a bare analogy, and I claim no thaumaturgic properties in its further application to plain folk of the Great Depression South. The hope, among the most distressed of the Great Depression, of inclusion in one of three “American Goshens” must have engendered feelings at least in some ways akin to those of the Hebrew children as they viewed Goshen for the first time.
format eBook
author Fred C. Smith
author_sort Fred C. Smith
title Trouble in Goshen
title_short Trouble in Goshen
title_full Trouble in Goshen
title_fullStr Trouble in Goshen
title_full_unstemmed Trouble in Goshen
title_sort trouble in goshen
publisher University Press of Mississippi
publishDate 2014
url http://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=52768
isbn ebook 506
_version_ 1702748814065008640
score 14.79448