Reflections on Judging

My subject is the challenges that the federal courts face today, with particular emphasis on rising complexity. My approach is personal, in the sense of drawing heavily on my own experience as a judge. It is also realistic, in the sense of rejecting formalist approaches to law. Those are approaches...

Full description

Main Author: RICHARD A. POSNER
Format: eBook
Language: Bahasa Inggris
Published: Harvard University Press 2013
Subjects:
Online Access: http://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=53087
PINJAM
id oai:lib.umy.ac.id:53087
recordtype oai_dc
spelling oai:lib.umy.ac.id:530872021-06-16T13:06:27ZReflections on JudgingRICHARD A. POSNERJudicial process, Appellate procedure,lawMy subject is the challenges that the federal courts face today, with particular emphasis on rising complexity. My approach is personal, in the sense of drawing heavily on my own experience as a judge. It is also realistic, in the sense of rejecting formalist approaches to law. Those are approaches premised on a belief that all legal issues can be resolved by logic, text, or precedent, without a judge ’s personality, values, ideological leanings, background and culture, or real-world experience playing any role. The realist tradition in judging is the tradition shaped by such outstanding judges as John Marshall, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, Robert Jackson, Learned Hand, Roger Traynor, and Henry Friendly. It is distinct from, though it overlaps, the “legal realist” movement of the 1920s and 1930s, which petered out, though not without leaving a mark.1 I need to say more about formalism and realism, which provide a contrast fundamental to this book, and will do so shortly.Harvard University Press2013eBookebook 628Bahasa Inggrishttp://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=53087
institution Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
collection Perpustakaan Yogyakarta
language Bahasa Inggris
topic Judicial process, Appellate procedure,law
spellingShingle Judicial process, Appellate procedure,law
RICHARD A. POSNER
Reflections on Judging
description My subject is the challenges that the federal courts face today, with particular emphasis on rising complexity. My approach is personal, in the sense of drawing heavily on my own experience as a judge. It is also realistic, in the sense of rejecting formalist approaches to law. Those are approaches premised on a belief that all legal issues can be resolved by logic, text, or precedent, without a judge ’s personality, values, ideological leanings, background and culture, or real-world experience playing any role. The realist tradition in judging is the tradition shaped by such outstanding judges as John Marshall, Oliver Wendell Holmes, Louis Brandeis, Benjamin Cardozo, Robert Jackson, Learned Hand, Roger Traynor, and Henry Friendly. It is distinct from, though it overlaps, the “legal realist” movement of the 1920s and 1930s, which petered out, though not without leaving a mark.1 I need to say more about formalism and realism, which provide a contrast fundamental to this book, and will do so shortly.
format eBook
author RICHARD A. POSNER
author_sort RICHARD A. POSNER
title Reflections on Judging
title_short Reflections on Judging
title_full Reflections on Judging
title_fullStr Reflections on Judging
title_full_unstemmed Reflections on Judging
title_sort reflections on judging
publisher Harvard University Press
publishDate 2013
url http://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=53087
isbn ebook 628
_version_ 1702748879609397248
score 14.79448