Cover Image

JURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan Indonesia

Research examines the focus of social identity and cultural identity of individuals between states of Germany, China and Indonesia. Building a sense of one's cultural identity is comprised of various identities that are interconnected with face negotiation theory perspective. Research constr...

Full description

Main Author: Dasrun Hidayat
Format: Jurnal
Language: Bahasa Inggris
Published: ASPIKOM 2014
Subjects:
social identity, culture identity, multiculture Public Relations
Online Access: http://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=82108
PINJAM
id oai:lib.umy.ac.id:82108
recordtype oai_dc
spelling oai:lib.umy.ac.id:821082021-06-16T13:10:56ZJURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan IndonesiaDasrun Hidayatsocial identity, culture identity, multiculture Public RelationsResearch examines the focus of social identity and cultural identity of individuals between states of Germany, China and Indonesia. Building a sense of one's cultural identity is comprised of various identities that are interconnected with face negotiation theory perspective. Research constructive significance intersubjective phenomenology with qualitative constructivist paradigm. The study found that the inter-state identity constructed in a different manner. Germany builds social identity because of the role of government not of the family. Germany does not take into account the family so that the identity of individual awakes more independent. Chinese social identity constructed by social status, stratum or class. China still sees a group of men as dominant and women as a minority. Socially constructed male identity as it is considered more capable than women. Social identity of opposites so that social structures are built are also different. Similarly, Indonesia, social identity is built almost the same as China, only differentiating factor lies in obedience to carry out the norms and values prevailing in the social strata. Indonesia and China still uphold the cultural dimension of collectivity than Germany Individual dimensions. Using multicultural Public Relations function approach finally be able to recognize the cultural identity of each country and eah social identityASPIKOM 2014Jurnal115-126ISBN:ISSN 2087-0442JURNAL ASPIKOM Tahun Vol. No. 2014 2 2 Bahasa Inggrishttp://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=82108
institution Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
collection Perpustakaan Yogyakarta
language Bahasa Inggris
topic social identity, culture identity, multiculture Public Relations
spellingShingle social identity, culture identity, multiculture Public Relations
Dasrun Hidayat
JURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan Indonesia
description Research examines the focus of social identity and cultural identity of individuals between states of Germany, China and Indonesia. Building a sense of one's cultural identity is comprised of various identities that are interconnected with face negotiation theory perspective. Research constructive significance intersubjective phenomenology with qualitative constructivist paradigm. The study found that the inter-state identity constructed in a different manner. Germany builds social identity because of the role of government not of the family. Germany does not take into account the family so that the identity of individual awakes more independent. Chinese social identity constructed by social status, stratum or class. China still sees a group of men as dominant and women as a minority. Socially constructed male identity as it is considered more capable than women. Social identity of opposites so that social structures are built are also different. Similarly, Indonesia, social identity is built almost the same as China, only differentiating factor lies in obedience to carry out the norms and values prevailing in the social strata. Indonesia and China still uphold the cultural dimension of collectivity than Germany Individual dimensions. Using multicultural Public Relations function approach finally be able to recognize the cultural identity of each country and eah social identity
format Jurnal
author Dasrun Hidayat
author_sort Dasrun Hidayat
title JURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan Indonesia
title_short JURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan Indonesia
title_full JURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan Indonesia
title_fullStr JURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed JURNAL ASPIKOM : Social and Cultural Identity Pendekatan Face Negotation Theory dan Public Relations Multikulturalism Negara Jerman-China dan Indonesia
title_sort jurnal aspikom : social and cultural identity pendekatan face negotation theory dan public relations multikulturalism negara jerman-china dan indonesia
physical 115-126
publisher ASPIKOM
publishDate 2014
url http://oaipmh-jogjalib.umy.ac.idkatalog.php?opo=lihatDetilKatalog&id=82108
isbn ISBN:ISSN 2087-0442
callnumber-raw JURNAL ASPIKOM Tahun Vol. No. 2014 2 2
callnumber-search JURNAL ASPIKOM Tahun Vol. No. 2014 2 2
_version_ 1702754624616792064
score 14.79448

Similar Items